BETVISA Game Providers — Every Studio Covered Here

This section covers 4 game providers entries. A studio makes the games; a casino runs them — two different companies each answering to its own regulator, and losing sight of that distinction is the single most frequent slip in this part of the topic. Covered across these pages are the studios behind titles found in Philippine-facing lobbies — their identity, the scope of what they’re genuinely licensed for, and whether a checkable return-to-player figure gets published.

Everything in this section

Studio	Publishes RTP	Specialisms	Licence position
JDB Gaming	No	fish shooting games, slots	PAGCOR (Electronic Gaming Licensing Department)
JILI	No	slots, fishing games	PAGCOR (Electronic Gaming Licensing Department)
FA CHAI Gaming	Yes	slots, 3D fishing games	Curacao Gaming Authority — status unresolved
PG Soft	Yes	slots	Malta Gaming Authority

4 pages here, one entry per page rather than several summarised together. When you see “not published” in a field above, the entry’s own page names the party responsible for publishing it.

Each entry in a paragraph

Each entry gets just enough detail to help you pick the page worth your time.

JDB Gaming explained

No founding year ever gets published, and no headquarters is ever named. Builds fish shooting games, slots.

PAGCOR (Electronic Gaming Licensing Department) sits at the top of the record list shown on its page. A list of game-content approvals is hosted directly on PAGCOR’s own site.

It publishes no RTP. None are quoted here for its titles, since the numbers floating around elsewhere are third-party estimates that don’t even agree among themselves.

JILI explained

No founding year ever gets published, and no headquarters is ever named. Its catalogue spans slots, fishing games, table and card games, and bingo.

PAGCOR (Electronic Gaming Licensing Department) sits at the top of the record list shown on its page. Games from JILI are on record as approved electronic games under PAGCOR EGLD.

It publishes no RTP. None are quoted here for its titles, since the numbers floating around elsewhere are third-party estimates that don’t even agree among themselves.

The FA CHAI Gaming entry

Founded 2019, and states no headquarters. Its lineup covers slots, 3D fishing games, arcade games, and table games.

Curacao Gaming Authority sits at the very top of the record shown on its page. Licence OGL/2024/1184/1010 sits with WiseInNet Technologies B.V., the company behind FA CHAI’s site.

A quoted RTP number for any of its titles can be walked straight back to the studio, since publishing that data is exactly what the studio does. RTP checking is most direct with FA CHAI among the seven studios here, given that its own public games listing states the figure plainly..

PG Soft explained

Founded 2015, based in Valletta, Malta. Builds slots.

Malta Gaming Authority is the entry sitting at the very top of its page’s record. Pocket Games Software Limited holds licence MGA/B2B/435/2017, filed under company number C 76195.

A quoted RTP number for any of its titles can be walked straight back to the studio, since publishing that data is exactly what the studio does. The dash a visitor sees where RTP should be is blank, though PG Soft does publish that figure — just within the data the server sends with the page, not on the page itself.

The thing most often got wrong here

Nothing here matters as much as telling a PAGCOR operator licence apart from a PAGCOR EGLD listing. When PAGCOR approves a studio’s game content for use by the operators it licenses, that approval is what an EGLD listing represents. This isn’t a licence in the studio’s name, and it offers no information about any casino that carries those games.

Limited to just that much are four of the seven studios you’ll find below. Every one of their pages spells this out clearly: “PAGCOR listed” and “PAGCOR licensed” sit a single word apart yet mean something entirely different — and readers are usually hoping to land on the second.

Look inside the game itself to confirm game providers details

You’re never asked to just take any of this at face value. A public register backs every licence claim made across these pages, and every one of those registers is open to check:

1. When checking a Malta licence, use the MGA authorisation portal and look up the company name, not the brand name. More often than not, the actual licensee is a subsidiary carrying a different name — Pragmatic Play’s Malta licence, for instance, belongs to Pragmatic Solutions MT Limited rather than to any company called Pragmatic Play.
2. Verification for a UK licence happens through one channel: the Gambling Commission’s public register, searched by account number. An active licence’s own record lists its activities with each one’s start date, and that same record also carries any regulatory settlement filed against the holder.
3. Pagcor.ph is the place to look — specifically the studio’s approved-games PDF — to confirm a PAGCOR EGLD listing. Understand the scope of that approval correctly — it covers game content meant for licensed operators. When the document is silent on the studio holding a licence, treat it as not holding one.
4. When you need an RTP figure, the only place to check is the studio’s own page for that exact title. When the figure isn’t there, no comparison site is capable of supplying it — and if two of them disagree, that very disagreement is the answer.

Finding game providers at BETVISA

1. At BETVISA, sign in and pull up the game lobby from there.
2. A studio-only view of the lobby works, and so does jumping straight to a title’s name in search.
3. Before you place a bet, pull up the game’s info screen and look over its stake range and paytable.
4. Decide on a session budget up front, and try new studios at a low stake to start.